Feeds:
Posts
Comments

From undergrad and graduate students across the Twin Cities campus to the different employee unions and classes, our momentum of broad-based support for Michele’s reinstatement continues. We include an example below the signature, from an e-mail sent out last week by AFSCME 3800 chief steward Cherrene Horazuk. We are Friends and Supporters in Solidarity with Michele Rockne! ***********************************************************************************************************

What subsequent probation is, why it needs to be eliminated, and why Michele Rockne deserves to be reinstated

Serving probation when you first start a job is common throughout the public and private sector. Serving multiple probationary periods at the same employer is extremely uncommon, however. But that is exactly what the University requires frontline staff to do. If you change jobs at the U, you will be required to serve probation every time. While on probation, you have minimal protection – an employer may fire you without cause, meaning that they need minimal reasons to get rid of somebody.

Our contract states a grievance can’t be filed over a worker’s failure to pass probation. We have seen long-term workers fail probation after having worked in a similar job for 10, 15, or even 20 years. Quite often, this happens with workers who are laid off from one position at the U and are hired into a vacancy off the layoff list or bump into a position. These workers have proven themselves over many years on the job, and should be recognized for their skills. Instead, the new supervisor acts as if the worker is damaged goods that are foisted upon them. And HR does nothing to challenge this gross misperception. Since our first contract, we have worked to get rid of the requirement that workers serve probation after their first time.

The bottom line is that subsequent probation is used to get rid of higher paid, long term workers, or other workers that supervisors don’t want.

In a culture where the experience and knowledge that comes with age is not valued, subsequent probation is used to get rid of people who supervisors see as “not fitting the image of a department”. This has become even more apparent this year as we have seen several long term employees laid off from positions they have held successfully for years, and then they have been told that they are suddenly not competent for a new job with the same or similar duties.

The latest egregious example of this is Michele Rockne. Michele started working at the University of Minnesota in May 2000. For over nine years she helped build up the Career Services Office of the Institute of Technology. After many years supporting the Institute of Technology and its future graduates, IT management scaled back services to its students and laid Michele off. There happened to be a vacancy open in the same job classification in the Fine Theoretical Physics Institute and without any other recourse, Michele accepted this position.

Michele welcomed her new responsibilities, but soon learned that management in the Fine Institute would not establish clear expectations that would help her succeed in this position while refusing to provide proper training in certain new tasks. Michele asked for assistance on numerous occasions and unfortunately, further attempts to clarify expectations with management were met with disdain. Management went so far as to say that “setting standards and clarifying expectations in advance would be unfair to a University employee.” After almost 10 years of service to the University, Michele was failed on probation and forced out of her job.

Help Reinstate Michele Rockne Sign the online petition at: http://www.thepetitionsite.com/3/reinstate-michele

Please call or email Professor Mikhail Voloshin, Director of the Fine Institute for Theoretical Physics, and tell him to do the right thing and reinstate Michele. His number is 612-625-0798 and his email is: voloshin@physics.umn.edu.

When you call, feel free to use or adapt the following script:

“Hello, my name is _____ and I am a [Fellow AFSCME member, U of MN student, co-worker of Michele's, colleague of Michele's, etc.]. I’m calling to share my frustrations with your decision to remove Michele from her position at the University. I demand that you reinstate Michele and subsequently establish clear standards to help this long-term employee succeed in the Fine Institute.

You removed a dedicated employee during a probationary period – the second probationary period this employee has served, having long since proven her worth and expertise in serving University students and faculty over the past 9 and-a-half years. I expect you and the University to do the right thing and I’ll continue to follow-up on this issue until it’s resolved.”

Take a Stand Against Layoffs Michele wouldn’t even be in this situation if her original department had not laid her off. As the third largest public employer in Minnesota, the U has an obligation to retain its employees.

University workers are not the problem, since our salaries have remained stagnant while the number of vice-deans, vice-provosts and vice-presidents has risen dramatically. The budget is not a zero sum game between students and front-line staff, while upper level administration staffing remains inviolate.

Clerical positions have been cut from 3200 to 1600 in the past 15 years, while P&A positions increased 1000% in the same time period, from several hundred to almost 4000 positions! Clerical staff have been forced to work harder than ever to do the jobs that were previously done by two or three. Further cuts jeopardize the academic mission of the University. Over $7 million can be saved with a 10% reduction in the number of top administrative positions.

As many of you know, members of SDS at the University of Minnesota are facing student conduct code charges for dropping banners at freshman convocation on September 3rd of 2009. These charges include theft, disorderly conduct, misuse of university facilities, and unauthorized access of a university building. What is more, we were charged without proof or evidence from the university that any particular individuals were involved.

Individuals still enrolled at the U of M were obligated to go to individual interviews with the Office of Student Conduct and Academic Integrity (OSCAI). After the first couple of meetings it was clear to us that the university was employing scare tactics as a way to dismantle the group and “rat” each other out. The OSCAI interviewers claimed that suspension, expulsion, and a revocation of degrees would be possible, and one member did in fact note that the interviewer questioned their ability to graduate.

An outpouring of support for SDS came into the inboxes and voicemails of all the individuals in charge of the reprimands our chapter now faces. Students from across the country called in, alumni spouted their disapproval, faculty, graduate students, staff, grassroots organizations all demanded that university drop their outrageous charges against SDS at the U of M. A warm thank you goes out to all who took the time to stand up for free speech and a right to dissent on our campuses!

Victoriously, the university did drop the charges filed against the five students who have already had their meetings. We can only assume that this decision was prompted by the support rallied around SDS. This, unfortunately, is only a partial victory as four SDS members are still currently facing charges.

Jerry Reinhart, Vice Provost of Student and Academic Affairs, recently announced in the MN Daily paper that SDS members were NOT facing potential expulsion or suspension and in an editorial he wrote, insinuated that SDS and the press were lying about the charges we were told we might face. Not only is this denying what the OSCAI clearly has stated in former meetings but it is also slandering a student group as well as a MN Daily reporter. Reinhart’s public rebuttal indicates that either there is a severe lack of communication between the OSCAI and the administration OR that Reinhart is attempting to clear the university from pressing the charges originally threatened by the OSCAI.

The four SDS members currently awaiting their interviews have decided to have legal representatives present at the undemocratic meetings the university decides to hold. Moreover, we are demanding that we be granted a joint meeting rather than requiring those still facing charges to meet with OSCIA individually, as these meetings have shown to be a strategy to separate and divide our organization. We are also demanding the presence of Jerry Reinhart at the meeting, as we believe it to be a positive step forward for the university bodies to get their stories straight on what exactly our potential charges are.

We will keep folks updated as things happen and another warm thank you for all the solidarity and support we have received.
Resistance and Struggle,
Students for a democratic Society at the University of Minnesota

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: UIUC STRIKE CONTINUES TUESDAY 11/17 AT 8 AM

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: UIUC STRIKE CONTINUES TUESDAY 11/17 AT 8 AM

ADMINISTRATION SPREADS MISINFORMATION ABOUT PICKET LINES

URBANA-CHAMPAIGN (November 17): On Tuesday, November 17, at 8 am, the Graduate Employees’ Organization (GEO), AFT/IFT Local 6300, AFL-CIO, The University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (UIUC), will continue its strike against the Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois.  All buildings previously picketed by the GEO will continue to be designated as “struck” buildings.

On Monday, November 16, at least 1,000 GEO members and their allies picketed four major classroom buildings on the UIUC Liberal Arts and Sciences quad.  Up to 700 GEO members and allies were present on picket lines at any given time.  Hundreds of teaching sections and classes were suspended, while major classroom buildings including the English Building were completely shut down.

The GEO Strike Committee called a strike after months of stalled negotiations.  While the GEO and the UIUC administration agreed in principle on most elements of a contract in a bargaining session on November 14, the administration refused to provide sufficient protection for most tuition waivers in the GEO bargaining unit.  The administration’s offer provided only some protection for in-state tuition waivers, even though the majority of the GEO bargaining unit receives out-of-state waivers.

Tuition waivers are a traditional and necessary condition of employment that allows students to earn a degree without incurring extreme debt. By helping to ensure affordable access to higher education for all, tuition waivers are also central to the public, land grant mission of the University of Illinois. Waivers also play a vital role in attracting top students to the University’s graduate programs. At the same time, they provide the University with high quality, cheap instructional labor.  Graduate employees teach 23.1% of all undergraduate course hours at UIUC, yet assistant salaries represent less than 6.5% of the University’s state funding. As a comparison, faculty salaries account for over 55% of state funding.

Tuition waivers have been one of the four “pillars” of the GEO’s contract platform since negotiations began on April 21st, 2009.  The GEO believes that the administration’s reluctance to include sufficient protection for all tuition waivers, both in-state and out of state, stems from a desire to phase out the provision of full tuition waivers in some or all University departments.  Cary Nelson, UIUC Professor of English and President of the American Association of University Professors, issued this statement in support of the GEO strike: “Given that the administration had already eliminated them for research assistants in the sciences, there was good reason to fear administration interest in cherry picking humanities or social science sub-disciplines for similar treatment… once again an activist union is working to keep higher education’s core values in place.”

The GEO and UIUC administration bargaining teams will meet Tuesday, 11/17 at 9 am in the UIUC Levis Faculty Center for further contract negotiations.  The GEO is hopeful that the administration will agree to language guaranteeing tuition waiver security, an issue that represents no increased cost to the University.  The University’s public statements in support of tuition waivers are misleading, as they are not reflective of the administration’s position in the bargaining room.  The GEO hopes that the University’s stance in the bargaining room on Tuesday will be more in line with its public statements.

Finally, the GEO would like to alert members of the UIUC campus to misinformation being spread by the University administration about what constitutes crossing a picket line. In the Chronicle of Higher Education on November 16, University Spokeswoman Robin Kaler said that the administration has encouraged GEO members to hold classes away from picketed buildings, and has assured members that this is not in violation of a strike.  This statement is extremely misleading, as the GEO’s public position and its position to membership has always been that only a total work stoppage, that is, cessation of all labor pertaining to a graduate employees’ teaching or graduate assistantship, constitutes participation in a strike by GEO members.  The GEO calls upon the University administration to stop spreading misinformation about the strike to graduate employees.

The GEO is a labor union representing all teaching and graduate assistants (TAs and GAs) on the UIUC campus.  With over 2600 GEO members, and over 2600 graduate employees represented in the bargaining unit, the GEO is one of the largest higher education union locals in the United States.  The GEO strike is the first strike by a recognized union local at UIUC in over 10 years.

FOR MORE INFORMATION, CONTACT: Peter Campbell, GEO Communications Officer, odell.campbell@gmail.com, 253-222-5861, or the GEO office at geo@uigeo.org, 217-344-8283, 1001 S. Wright Street, Champaign, IL, 61820.  Information about the GEO can also be found on our website at www.uigeo.org.

###

SUSPEND OVERPAID ADMINISTRATORS, NOT STUDENTS: Call to support the members of SDS at the University of Minnesota

Because of our action at Convocation ‘09 we are now facing individual charges up to suspension and revocation of our degrees. We ask for all of our supporters, all supporters of free speech on our campuses, and all those that support the right to education to call and tell the University of Minnesota that SDS members should not face disciplinary charges for our actions at Convocation.

The Office of Student Affairs is threatening all members of SDS saying we are responsible for stealing the banners used in the action, improperly using the space, and that we were disruptive to a closed university function. We question all of these claims. First off the banners that we used were found, and were clearly NEVER going to be used by the university – they articulated outdated goals & campaigns and outdated fashion!

Secondly, we believe that the building and event that we interrupted was in need of some perspective. The event is traditionally meant as a rallying point to make incoming students blind to the excesses of the university administration. Our banner drop highlighted to students for only a few minutes the hypocrisy of an administration that is raising tuition while receiving free housing and enormous salaries.

Call:

Office of Student Affairs Provost of Student Affairs Jerry Reinhart g-rine@umn.edu 612-626-1242

Sharon K Dzik sdzik@umn.edu 612-624-6073

President Robert Bruininks bruin001@umn.edu 612-626-1616

Bellow you will find links to the media about the action and our formal appeal letter:

http://www.mndaily.com/2009/09/03/students-interrupt-convocation

http://www.mndaily.com/2009/10/05/sds-fights-back

http://www.mndaily.com/2009/11/02/protest-part-democratic-society

To All Supporters of Students for a Democratic Society at the U of MN

Because of our action at Convocation ’09 we are now facing sanctions against our SDS chapter. The sanctions that we are currently appealing would ensure that we would have NO rights as a student group – we could no longer reserve rooms on our campus, we couldn’t be part of the handful of functions open to student groups, and we can’t apply for any grants.

We ask for all of our supporters and all supporters of free speech on our campuses to call and tell the University of Minnesota that SDS should not face sanctions for our actions at Convocation. The Student Union Activities office has placed sanctions against us saying that we stole the banners used in the action, we improperly used the space, and that we were disruptive to a closed university function. We question all of these findings.

First off the banners that we used were found, and were clearly NEVER going to be used by the university – they articulated outdated goals & campaigns and outdated fashion! Secondly, we believe that the building and event that we interrupted was in need of some perspective. The event is traditionally meant as a rallying point to make students blind to the excesses of the university administration. Our banner drop highlighted to students for only a few minutes the hypocrisy of an administration that is raising tuition while receiving free housing and enormous salaries.

 Call:

Student Union Activities Office

Associate Director Denny Olsen olsen013@umn.edu 612-625-6295

Assistant Director Megan Sweet vande104@umn.edu 612-625-8266

President Robert Bruininks bruin001@umn.edu 612-626-1616

Bellow you will find links to the media about the action and our formal appeal letter:

http://www.fightbacknews.org/2009/09/u-of-m-sds-launches-save-our-school-campaign.htm

http://www.mndaily.com/2009/09/03/students-interrupt-convocation

Our Formal Appeal:

Denny Olsen and Whomever it May Concern,

Students for a Democratic Society at the University of Minnesota have decided to appeal the 1-year probation request put forward by the Student Union and Activities Office on October 5th. SDS is an organization that embraces the right to free speech; we are enthusiastic about a diversity of methods in which free speech is sought, including dropping banners during a university president’s speech. If the market place of ideas is off limits for students or student groups on campus via the student conduct code, then it is our opinion that the student conduct code should be revised immediately.

Under the student conduct code, SDS was found in violation of theft from the university for the banners that were dropped at Convocation. The charge of theft indicates that a person who was at one time in possession of these items is currently missing them and has requested their property be returned. From what the SUA has indicated, there has been no person requesting the immediate return of these banners, therefore they are not being missed. Furthermore, this charge is a radical assumption that SDS did indeed steal these banners from someone, a charge that from the beginning SDS has denied. This was charged without proof or evidence from the SUA and SDS stands by our conviction that they were in fact found items.

SDS has also been charged with unauthorized use of university facilities. As a public university, SDS believes that no buildings should be shut down to persons who are either of the university community or who financially aid the university. This includes: students, staff, faculty, administrators, alumni, tax payers, etc. Furthermore, SDS recognizes that the current financial status of our university is a crisis situation. To shutdown students from organizing the university community into action should be an embarrassment to the university.

Finally, SDS is being charged of engaging in disruptive behavior at convocation. SDS stands firm in recognizing a diversity of tactics when engaging the student body and sees alternative tactics as necessary in pursuing our campaign. A university that claims to adhere to a free speech policy should similarly recognize the diverse ways in which free speech is expressed.

SDS demands the right to eligibility as a recognized student group on campus. Limiting the right to speech on campus is a dangerous thing and should be seen as detrimental not only to the university, but also to the university community at large (students, faculty, staff). Our university should embrace radical thought and action, rather than limiting student groups who do not necessarily fall in line with the university’s politics.

Signed,

Members of the University of Minnesota Chapter of Students for a Democratic Society (UMN SDS)

From the University of California Struggle – Humanities Building Occupied!

October 16th, 2009

As of tonight, Humanities 2 has been occupied, along with the administrative building for Humanities and Social Sciences.

Because of the proliferation of occupations at UCSC, this group is changing into a solidarity group for the new occupation of the administrative building.

The UC administration has pledged ALL of our tuition money towards making more buildings. They have used the California financial crisis as a means to produce more tuition money so that they can simply produce more buildings.

This is symptomatic of Capitalism, and it is most definitely time to take a stand against both the privatization of our University and the untenable situation of our failing economic order.

Please spread around the group, invite all of your friends, come out and support the occupation, together we will never be alone again.

YO!

SDS opener ‘09Look at this fancy pantsy updated flyer for SOS and SDS meetings – distribute widley.SDS opener ‘09

occupyca.wordpress.com

PLEASE TAKE THE BELOW STATEMENT AND READ IT TO YOUR CLASSES

From the graveyard of history comes a plea from the undead… BE REALISTIC, DEMAND THE IMPOSSIBLE!!!

I sincerely hope that all of you know about the walkout and the student occupation that took place the whole first week of school. The struggle continues, and this message is brought to you by those students who were a part of the occupation as well as those who have joined them in their fight.

One of the most bewildering observations made from the inside of these events, especially the student occupation, was the realization of how symbolically important they were for activists all around the world- within hours a solidarity rally was held in Union Square in New York; letters of solidarity have come groups from all over California, all over the US, as well from as far away as South Africa, Croatia, the UK, Greece, and Italy; The UK Guardian ran an editorial several days ago on the emergence of new student movements that began its story with the UCSC occupation- and here, right in front of us, how unimportant they were for those who passed by and read our banners, looking upon us as if we were no different than some student group in the quad advertising our fraternity of sorority.

The most common criticism we’ve heard time and time again in response to these actions, posed by skeptics on the sideline, is the question, “Do you really think this is going to change anything?” There is a short and simple answer to this one. “No, absolutely fucking not.” As single actions, as single events composed of only an insignificant percentage of the student/worker body, from the start, they had no chance of doing anything at all. Sometimes it seems that the only thing that could have possibly appeased the people who asked this question is if the morning after the events, the world entered into a new perfect era of peace, freedom, equality, and prosperity.

Their cynicism reeks the stench of premature death, as if history were already written and nothing could be done to change it. We won’t accept this. We can’t accept this. If we do then there is no point to anything, no point to education, no point to even wake up in the morning.

For those of us who are juniors and seniors, we try to put the problem out of our minds and just focus on graduating, feeling lucky we’ll be able to finish before it gets worse, but trying as hard as possible not to think about what comes next in the absence of a job market and a secure future. For those of us who are freshman and sophomores, we feel cheated and robbed, financially and academically as we are forced to pay more for less and more crowded classes that no longer have sections and TA’s to help us, and socially and culturally as we are now expected to partake in a fight over a problem we didn’t start, at a time when we just want to have that standard right of passage college experience of partying and getting to know ourselves.

No one here picked this crisis. No one wants this crisis (except of course for those corporate oligarchs who are able to find it profitable). But it is a reality that we must step up to challenge.

The media likes to pick rhetoric that softens the blow- what we are dealing with is a recession, just a temporary setback; we just have to buckle up right now, fasten our belts, and get through it; we just need our faculty and staff to take something called “furloughs.” Yudof explained the meaning of this word perfectly to the New York Times, saying the reason for using the word “furlough” is that it sounds more, “temporary than “salary cut.”

What we’re experiencing right now isn’t a temporary setback, but an irreversible downward spiral. It is a fundamental restructuring of society always passed quickly and covertly during times of crisis, meant to leave people so shocked and awed at what is happening to them that they are unable to organize and respond. (Why do you think that the majority of these “resolutions” were passed during the summer months when students were away?) It is a phenomenon that has already occurred all over the world where free trade economic policies cut social services and put everything under private control, giving unimaginable power to an elite few while impoverishing the rest. It is an economic shock therapy treatment pioneered in the US that has now come home.

We’re being fucked right now and history has given us no reason to believe that anything will ever get better without a fight!

WE ARE YOUR FRIENDS

Many slogans were generated as a result of the first week’s occupation. Many of them were chanted by hundreds of students who partook in what were meant to be politically galvanizing dance parties. One of the many slogans produced from the occupation was “No business as usual!” As classes return to “normal” (albeit severely lacking resources available in the past), it would seem this message has already gone unheeded. This year can’t be like any other year. It already isn’t.

The problem does indeed seem like an impossible one to solve but in an allusion to the spirit of a student movement before us, for a week over the quad flew the words: “Be realistic, demand the impossible, or else…” that is, or else be ready to face the consequences of inaction- a society that no longer considers working towards anything but a centrist political compromise, and a civilization that is no longer able to dream of bettering itself.

Perhaps most notorious of the slogans was the single demand “We want everything!” Why should we want less? We want everything back that’s been taken from us and we want shit we didn’t even have in the first place. We want our junior high track team back. We want our state parks protected. We want a job market with the promise good paying jobs with benefits. We want well functioning affordable universities with well paid staff and faculty. We want all war to end. We want a just, free, equal society. We want the promise of a bright future. We want the impossible, and to get it, we need to be willing to do the impossible. We must end this dead end logic that waits for hope to fall as manna from the sky above. We must ourselves be the hope that we desire.

There are many ways for everyone to get involved in what, at this point, cannot be anything less than a broad social movement. Everyone must think what knowledge, skills, and resources they possess that they can contribute what ideas they have to push this struggle forward. We must organize. Start just with your immediate friends and make a plan for action. You don’t have to do this in place of partying; as our dance parties were meant to show, activism can be a party itself. Form networks amongst smaller groups and coordinate efforts. Break down the barriers between undergraduate students, graduate students, workers, professors, and community members. We’re all in this together. If you disagree with any of the tactics that have been used, then don’t simply criticize; pick and follow through with tactics you don’t disagree with. We are all working towards the same end. Together we must make this year, and the years to come, and however long it takes, something the administration, the state, and all of those who got us into this fiscal mess, wish they had never started.

WE ARE THE CRISIS!

AND WE’RE JUST GETTING STARTED…

President Obama announced in March that he would be sending 21,000 additional troops to Afghanistan. But in an unannounced move, the White House has also authorized — and the Pentagon is deploying — at least 13,000 troops beyond that number, according to defense officials

Read Here

Older Posts »